Diversified International - these type of funds invest
primarily in
economically well-developed, broad-based countries outside of the United States,
using the MSCI EAFE Index as a benchmark. According to
Morningstar, these developed markets
currently include Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New
Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.The main objective of these funds is long-term
capital appreciation, whether using value, blend or growth strategies. A
value-style strategy focuses on stocks that are believed to be
undervalued in price and has potential to return to a "fair
market" valuation. By contrast, a growth-style strategy emphasizes
stocks which have the potential to sustain high rates of revenue or earnings
growth; these growth-style strategies usually have higher risk compared to
value-style strategies.
- Foreign Large Value - majority of assets invest in large-capitalization
foreign stocks that have low price/book and price/cash flow
ratios.
- Foreign Large Blend - majority of assets invest in large-capitalization
foreign stocks, where neither value-oriented or growth-oriented characteristics
predominate.
- Foreign Large Growth - majority of assets invest in large-capitalization
foreign stocks that have high price/book and price/cash flow
ratios.
- Foreign Small/Mid Value - majority of assets invest in small and
mid-capitalization foreign stocks that have low price/book and
price/cash flow ratios. Underdeveloped markets have a greater role compared
to the foreign large capitalizations.
- Foreign Small/Mid Growth - majority of assets invest in small and
mid-capitalization foreign stocks that have high price/book and
price/cash flow ratios. Underdeveloped markets have a greater role compared
to the foreign large capitalizations.
Global (World)
- this fund type invests
primarily in diversified and established
large-capitalization markets, including at least 20% in the United States. The main objective of these funds is long-term
capital appreciation, usually employing various mixes of value and growth strategies.
Global funds usually also invest a small amount of assets in emerging markets.
Regional - funds of this type invest in targeted global regions. Diversification
is lower and volatility is higher compared to broader-based international funds.
Long-term capital appreciation is the primary objective.
- Europe - invests at least 75% of assets in Europe,
primarily in established markets.
- Diversified Pacific/Asia - invests at least 75% of
assets in Pacific/Asia markets, primarily in established markets.
- Pacific/Asia ex-Japan - same as above, except
these funds do not invest in Japan.
- Latin America - invests at least 75% of assets in Latin America,
all of which is classified as underdeveloped markets.
Emerging Markets - these funds invest in
economically underdeveloped
countries. Volatility and risk can range from high to very high. Long-term capital
appreciation is the objective.
Single County - funds of this type target one specific
country, which may be either established or emerging in economic development.
Diversification is very low; volatility and risk can range from above average to very
high. Long-term capital appreciation is the primary objective.
Foreign Allocation Guidelines
With eleven different types of
foreign funds, where does an investor start? The fundamentals of
effective diversification - the spreading of assets
over diverse and distinct
fund categories to achieve (1) specific risk/reward objectives and (2) a
reduction of overall portfolio risk - should remain the
cornerstone of investment strategy.
With this in mind, the choices for
foreign allocation is largely dependent upon (1) portfolio size and (2) individual risk tolerance.
The size of one's portfolio will determine the number of
foreign funds: the larger the portfolio, the greater number of different
foreign funds. Risk tolerance is also a significant factor in not only the number of
funds, but also in the selection of different types of foreign funds: generally,
the
higher the individual tolerance for risk, the greater number of foreign fund
types are available and appropriate for the portfolio.
How to qualify risk tolerance? Conservative risk tolerances
will accept lower returns to minimize price volatility. Moderate, or
average, risk tolerances will accept greater price volatility than
conservative risk tolerances to pursue higher returns. Aggressive risk
tolerances will accept large swings in price volatility to seek the highest
returns. In addition, currency valuations and political stability are
additional risk factors to consider when choosing foreign funds.
Foreign Allocation Suggestions
The following foreign
allocation suggestions assume a long-term,
growth-oriented return objective strategy. Note: As investors approach
retirement and if the growth-oriented asset strategy changes to one of a
balance-oriented or income-oriented asset strategy, then investors should scale
back on these foreign allocations.
For conservative risk tolerances, the foreign equity
allocation can range from 10-15% of the overall portfolio. Either a
global, foreign large value, or foreign large blend fund would be
appropriate. If the size of the portfolio is over $75,000, then a second
fund, a foreign mid/small value, could be added to enhance return and
diversification; however, this second fund should be no greater than
one-third the size of the first fund. Regional, emerging market and single
country foreign fund categories are inappropriate for a conservative risk
tolerance.
For moderate risk tolerances, the foreign equity
allocation can range from 15-25% of the overall portfolio. Either a
foreign large value or blend would be appropriate for a core international
fund. With larger portfolio sizes of over $100,000, a second and
possibly a third fund could be added -- these second and third foreign funds
should total no greater than one-third the size of the first fund. The second
and, if chosen, third fund could choose from the following categories:
foreign small/mid value, regional and, to a much lesser degree, emerging
markets. The single
country foreign fund category is inappropriate for a moderate risk
tolerance.
For aggressive risk tolerances, the foreign equity
allocation can range from 20-35% of the overall portfolio. A foreign large
blend or growth would be appropriate for a core international fund. With
larger portfolio sizes of over $100,000, a second, third, and
possibly a fourth fund could be added -- these second, third and fourth
foreign funds should total no greater than one-third the size of the core fund
-- these additional funds could choose from foreign small/mid value or
growth, emerging markets, and to a lesser degree, single country funds.
Note:
an alternative strategy for one foreign core holding is to choose two
regional funds such as Europe with Asia/Pacific or Pacific/Asia ex-Japan to
achieve desired allocation percentages for these two funds (e.g., 60/40, 55/45, 40/60, etc.).
Investors should realistically evaluate their tolerance for
risk on a regular basis. In my opinion, many investors
initially take overly excessive risk, only to realize their mistake when
significant negative losses occur. Be deliberate and realistic when assessing your individual
risk tolerance. If a sizable loss would adversely affect your long-term
viewpoint, then (1) descend to the next lower level of risk tolerance, (2) select
less risky foreign fund categories or (3) choose lower allocation percentages in
existing fund categories.
Finally, once an investor has
chosen the appropriate foreign fund categories, the next step involves
selecting specific funds. Select no-load funds with above-average category
performance, objective and style adherence, preferably long-tenured management and
average to below-average operating expenses for each particular fund category.