Identifying individual risk
tolerance is one of the basic factors in determining an
optimum investment strategy for a mutual fund portfolio. Regardless of the
return objectives and time horizon within a portfolio, risk tolerance affects both asset
allocation and especially the selection of fund categories (i.e., large
value, small growth, international, short-term bond, intermediate-term bond, etc.).
Let's first define risk. In general, risk refers to the
fluctuations in the price of a security -- these fluctuations, known as volatility, can range from stable
to exceedingly changeable. In addition, many different types of specific risk exist which can
affect investment value: bonds generally have various degrees
of credit risk, inflation risk, interest rate risk and
principal risk; stocks can have dividend risk, market risk,
and, in foreign stocks, currency and political risks.
As the level of risk increases, both volatility and total return
potential proportionately increase; conversely, as the level of risk
decreases, both volatility and total return potential
proportionately decrease. This standard risk/reward rule
is often illustrated with risk and reward both escalating
over a broad spectrum beginning with cash reserves, changing
to bonds and then ending with stocks:
Although stock funds
exhibit greater risk and reward compared to bond funds, each
has a separate risk/reward spectrum. The following examples
depict risk/reward on an escalating basis by fund category:
Stock funds:
large value<large growth<mid
value<mid growth<small value<small growth<international<emerging
markets<sector
Bond funds:
short-term<government
mortgage<intermediate-term<multisector<long-term<high-yield<international<emerging
markets
In mutual funds,
risk tolerance is normally
associated with the degree of fluctuations in the
price of bond or stock funds. Investors typically fall into
one of three categories of overall risk tolerance: conservative, moderate or
aggressive.
Conservative risk
tolerances will accept lower returns to minimize price
volatility.
Moderate, or average, risk tolerances will accept greater price volatility
than conservative risk tolerances to pursue higher returns.
Aggressive risk
tolerances will accept large swings in price volatility to seek the highest
returns.
There are two contrasting
viewpoints regarding the application of risk tolerances in mutual
fund strategies. One
treats risk tolerance as a basic asset allocation
adjustment, covering only one risk/reward spectrum (cash,
bond and stock funds); examples include aggressive growth
(100% stock), growth (80% stock, 20% bond), moderate growth
(60% stock, 40% bond), conservative growth (40% stock, 60% bond), and income
(20% stock, 70% bond, 10% cash). The
other viewpoint treats risk tolerance as a fund category
allocation after selecting a basic asset allocation -- and then
selecting the types
of fund categories which are suitable for the desired risk tolerance --
this method allows more precision and
customization in designing an investment strategy than the basic asset
allocation method.
Choosing a basic asset allocation before selecting fund
categories is critical. In formulating an appropriate mutual fund
portfolio strategy, the determination of risk tolerance should be the
last criteria before fund category selections. Selecting fund categories prior
to establishing a basic asset allocation (based on investment stage,
time horizon, return objectives, portfolio size, then risk
tolerance) leads to haphazard fund selection, resulting
in an ineffective and inappropriate strategy -- see
Three Common Mistakes in
Mutual Fund Investing for further information.
Using the fund category allocation method, conservative, moderate or
aggressive risk tolerances can combine with a variety of
return objectives, subject to certain time horizon
restrictions. For example, any one of these risk tolerances
can match with a growth, balanced or income-oriented return
objective, provided that the time horizon is long-term. With
short-term or intermediate time horizons, any one of these three risk
tolerances can match with an income-oriented return objective
(growth-oriented return objectives require long-term time horizons).
Let's look at a
hypothetical situation that uses the fund category allocation method. In one
scenario, Jones and Smith
share nearly identical investment objectives. Each will
retire in 10 years and wants to reallocate $100,000 in a
long-term, balanced-oriented plan (equal emphasis on growth and income); however, Jones prefers an
aggressive
risk tolerance, Smith a conservative risk tolerance.
In
this scenario, a fundamental allocation consisting of 50% stock funds and 50%
bond funds applies to both portfolios. The
application of these risk tolerances could create the following fund categories and their allocation
percentages (note: this is just one example of many possibilities in this
scenario):
Jones:
25% large-cap growth, 15% mid-cap growth, 10% small-cap growth
|
|
25% multisector bond,
15% high-yield bond, 10% international bond
Smith:
30% large-cap value, 15% mid-cap
value, 5% small-cap value
| |
20% short-term bond, 15% intermediate-term
bond, 15% GNMA
In this scenario, these portfolios reflect the investment objectives and preferences of
Jones and Smith; yet both are very different in fund categories and allocations -- even though risk tolerance is
the only investment characteristic difference between
them.